Skip to content
MAS Single / SNO

A cost-effective MAS path for smaller Maximo teams.

MAS Single uses a Single Node OpenShift approach to give smaller teams a practical path into Maximo Application Suite without starting with a larger, more complex cluster architecture.

SNO
MAS OpenShift Database
Lower ComplexityA simpler starting point than larger MAS cluster deployments.
Cost-Effective PathUseful for smaller teams, pilots, trials, and lighter production workloads.
Still MASRun MAS applications in a dedicated environment built around your needs.
Why MAS Single

Not every MAS team needs to start with a large cluster.

MAS can feel expensive and complex, especially for smaller Maximo teams that want to move forward without overbuilding their first environment.

MAS Single gives qualifying teams a more approachable way to adopt MAS using a Single Node OpenShift architecture, while still preserving the dedicated hosting, support, and upgrade path MaxStack is built around.

MAS Single is a strong fit for:

  • Smaller Maximo teams
  • MAS pilots and trials
  • Manage, Health, and Mobile use cases
  • Lower-complexity production needs
  • Cost-sensitive MAS adoption
  • Teams planning a gradual MAS roadmap
What You Get

A focused MAS environment without unnecessary overhead.

Single Node OpenShift

A simplified OpenShift architecture that can reduce complexity for qualifying MAS use cases.

Dedicated Environment

A MAS environment built for your organization rather than a generic shared demo setup.

Fast Starting Point

Useful for teams that need to evaluate, pilot, or move into MAS without long setup cycles.

Upgrade Path

Can support teams moving from Maximo 7.6 into MAS with a more approachable first step.

Flexible Support

Use MaxStack support, bring your own consultant, or combine both in a practical support model.

Room to Grow

Start with MAS Single, then evaluate MAS Cluster or HCP Cluster if your needs expand.

MAS Single is about fit, not compromise.

The goal is not to underbuild your environment. The goal is to avoid unnecessary cost and complexity when a smaller, focused MAS architecture better matches your team’s current needs.

Consider MAS Single when:

  • Your user count is modest
  • Your module needs are focused
  • You want a faster MAS evaluation path
  • You are early in your MAS roadmap
  • You want lower operational complexity
  • You need a practical alternative to delaying MAS entirely
Comparison

MAS Single vs larger MAS hosting paths.

Category MAS Single MAS Cluster MAS HCP Cluster
Best fit Smaller teams / pilots Larger production teams Enterprise environments
Architecture Single Node OpenShift Dedicated cluster Hosted control plane
Complexity Lower Moderate Enterprise
Scalability Focused High Highest
Common use Pilot / focused MAS usage Production MAS hosting Large-scale MAS operations
How It Works

A simpler path into MAS.

1

Assess Fit

Review your user count, modules, integrations, availability needs, and support model.

2

Confirm Scope

Decide whether MAS Single is enough or whether MAS Cluster is the better path.

3

Provision

Create the Single Node OpenShift environment and MAS application layer.

4

Validate

Test access, workflows, database needs, integrations, reports, and user readiness.

5

Launch

Use MAS Single as your production, pilot, trial, or phased MAS starting point.

Interactive Guide

Is MAS Single likely a fit?

Connected Pages

MAS Single is one path in the larger MaxStack roadmap.

MAS Single can be the right starting point, but it should still connect to your hosting plan, upgrade strategy, support model, integration needs, and long-term MAS direction.

Common Questions

MAS Single / SNO FAQ

Find out if MAS Single is the right starting point.

Get a practical MAS path that fits your team today, while keeping room for growth as your roadmap expands.